I don't like to give the impression that I'm stalking the Pedant, because I'm not. But today is Oliver's day for pedantry, and once again I feel I have something to say. So, gee, why don't I just force myself to go ahead and say it?
The subject of Oliver's latest pedantry is: pronouns and their cases. His targets are the likes of 'to you and I' and 'to we who gaze', and he explains why it should be 'to you and me' and 'to us who gaze':
If they [personal pronouns] are the object or are governed by a preposition, they take the accusative case...
Fine. I never was a fan of 'between you and I' of the same ilk. On the other hand, if pedantry were to hit upon the locution 'It's me' - as responding to the question 'Who is it? - hit upon it, and then hit on it as incorrect because the accusative case doesn't belong in an assertion of identity following the verb 'to be', that would be a piece of pedantry too far. Strictly, 'It is I' would indeed be the correct form; but 'It's me' has become a familiar and acceptable usage, through... well, usage.
So - and here is the issue the Pedant needs to address, to make clear the basis of his weekly column - how may we discriminate between ways of speaking and writing that are incorrect even though they are in use, and ways of speaking and writing that have become domesticated, so to say, in the language, accepted as OK even though they are technically incorrect? Over to you, Oliver.