« Triumph in Australia | Main | Moderate sanity »

December 31, 2006

Talking about the execution

Saddam should not have been hanged. He should not have been, because judicial execution is not a morally defensible practice. Apart from other reasons, it brutalizes the community that inflicts it.

And Saddam should not have been hanged now, before having to come before a court to answer for his greatest crimes.

It would be nice, though, if those who wrote as if his execution was on all fours with his crimes displayed a better sense of proportion.

One:

Ending his life with a variant of the inhuman punishment he once meted out so lavishly was just another kick against human rights.
Two:
Mainstream middle-class sentiment in Europe now regards the death penalty as being as ethically tainted as the crimes that produced that sentence.
Here, for contrast, is Jason Burke:
In 2003, back in Sulaymaniyah, I sat down in a prison cell with a captured Baath party torturer. 'How old was the youngest person you ever tortured?' I asked him. 'Oh, about two or three,' he said unapologetically. 'We didn't torture the kids themselves obviously, but holding a toddler over a boiling saucepan is a very good way of getting their parents to talk.' Why do I return to all this? Because I can't help but be happy that Saddam has been executed.
.....
The fact that Saddam is now dead, whatever the manner of his passing, is a rare bit of positive news. Given the nightmare that is Iraq today, I'll save my sympathy for those who suffered under his bloody reign and those who still suffer today.

Links